Developmental Education Resource Center

  • Home
  • Developmental Education
  • Supplemental Instruction
  • Peer Tutoring
  • Organizations and Journals
  • Retention
  • Edu Blog


Which Citation Style to Teach First-Year Students?

When it comes to teaching academic writing in the first year of college, few topics seem as technical — or as intimidating — as citation styles. For many students just entering higher education, the rules of referencing feel foreign, rigid, and sometimes arbitrary. And for instructors and tutors in developmental education, the challenge lies in deciding where to start. Should we introduce APA, MLA, or Chicago style first? What do students actually need to know, and when?

Why Citation Style Matters in the First Year

For students transitioning from high school to college-level writing, citation isn’t just a formatting requirement — it’s a signal that expectations have changed.

In developmental education settings, where instructors often work with students who are still building foundational academic skills, introducing citation early helps shape habits that will carry through every discipline. Referencing teaches more than just “not plagiarizing.” It teaches intellectual honesty, traceability, and respect for the work of others.

But here’s the real issue: students are overwhelmed. They’re learning how to write longer papers, engage with scholarly texts, and meet deadlines. Adding strict formatting rules into the mix can backfire if it feels like an exercise in frustration.

That’s why it’s critical to choose one citation style to teach early and well — with a focus on clarity and confidence, not perfection.

Understanding the Three Main Styles

Let’s briefly review what makes each of the “big three” styles distinct:

Style Most Common In In-Text Format Reference Page
APA (American Psychological Association) Social sciences, education, psychology (Author, Year) “References”
MLA (Modern Language Association) Literature, humanities, arts (Author Page) “Works Cited”
Chicago (Chicago Manual of Style) History, publishing, theology Footnotes or (Author Year) “Bibliography” or “References”

Each system has its own rhythm. APA emphasizes currency and clarity, MLA focuses on authorship and close reading, and Chicago accommodates deep contextual or historical work.

To help educators and students navigate the differences, the Citation Style Guide 2025 provides side-by-side examples, formatting tips, and practical advice. It’s a helpful tool for instructors choosing which system best fits their curriculum — or for students who are juggling different expectations across courses.

Teaching APA: A Good Fit for Developmental Learners?

Many instructors in developmental education lean toward APA — and for good reason.

APA is widely used in the social sciences and in education itself. If students plan to pursue degrees in psychology, education, sociology, or even nursing, APA is likely to follow them throughout their college careers. That consistency can help students feel grounded.

APA also has a logic that suits research-driven writing. The emphasis on dates helps students pay attention to recency and credibility, which are crucial for evaluating sources. The format is clean, with clear rules for headings, references, and structure.

But here’s where it gets tricky: APA’s formatting rules are numerous and can be overwhelming. Hanging indents, italics, capitalization — it adds up fast. First-year students may focus so much on spacing and punctuation that they lose sight of the research itself.

Tip: Use simplified templates. Show students examples, not just rules. Tools like Zotero, BibGuru, and Google Docs add-ons (like Paperpile) can help — but only if students understand the reasoning behind the format.

MLA: Simpler Mechanics, Literary Focus

MLA is a favorite in literature and composition courses, particularly those that ask students to engage closely with texts. Its in-text citation — just the author’s last name and page number — is arguably the simplest of the three.

This simplicity can reduce anxiety. There’s no year to remember, no footnotes to wrangle. For students writing about novels, essays, or poems, MLA allows them to focus on the writing, not the structure.

Another benefit of MLA is that many students were exposed to it in high school, especially if they took AP English or used tools like EasyBib. That familiarity can be reassuring in a sea of new academic challenges.

The downside? MLA is less useful outside of the humanities. A student planning to major in business or science will almost certainly use APA instead. If your institution’s writing program starts with MLA, you’ll want to give students a heads-up that the rules may shift in later courses.

Tip: Use MLA if your developmental writing curriculum leans toward analysis and essay structure, especially in reading-intensive courses.

Chicago Style: Comprehensive, But Complex

Chicago is the go-to for history, archival studies, theology, and some branches of journalism and publishing. It’s also beloved by many researchers for its flexibility: it offers both a footnote-based system (Notes and Bibliography) and an in-text style (Author-Date) that resembles APA.

The richness of Chicago style makes it a great teaching tool — but not necessarily for first-year students. Footnotes require more advanced formatting, attention to detail, and patience. While they offer room for commentary and context, they can frustrate new writers who are still learning the basics of structure and organization.

Unless your students are writing history-heavy papers or preparing for seminary or graduate research, Chicago might be better introduced later, when they have a firmer grasp on academic conventions.

Tip: If you teach Chicago early, keep it simple. Provide formatting models and build in citation workshops.

What Else Should Drive Your Decision?

1. Departmental Expectations

Check if your institution or writing program has a preferred style. Uniformity across sections makes things easier for both students and faculty.

2. Transferability

Think about where your students are going next. Are they preparing for associate degrees? Planning to transfer to a four-year university? Helping them master a style that will follow them through their academic path increases the value of your instruction.

3. Pedagogical Goals

If your course focuses on research and synthesis, APA may be the best match. If your emphasis is on close reading and argument structure, MLA may be a better fit.

4. Student Confidence

First-year students don’t need to master every citation nuance. What they need is to see the value of citation — how it connects them to a broader conversation, helps them avoid plagiarism, and builds their credibility as writers.

Making Style Instruction Less Intimidating

Whichever style you choose, here are some strategies that work:

  • Start with the “why.” Explain the purpose of citation before the rules.
  • Use real examples. Show how published writers use citation to support their ideas.
  • Give choices when possible. Let students cite a source two or three different ways and talk about what changes.
  • Model mistakes. Show flawed examples and walk through corrections.
  • Use available guides. Share visual aids, printable charts, and resources like the Citation Style Guide 2025, which breaks down citation styles with clarity and relevance.

It’s Not Just About Formatting

In the end, choosing a citation style to teach first-year students isn’t just about grammar or guidelines. It’s about introducing them to a culture of scholarship.

Whether you start with APA for structure, MLA for simplicity, or Chicago for context, the goal is the same: help students become thinkers who can find, use, and honor the voices of others in their own academic work.

Choose the style that fits your course — and teach it as a tool, not a test.